Now, speaking about sub clocks means pointing directly to a category of timepieces that is normally employed for even ten per cent of its potential.
What good is it to get the best, which for him to dive to over 1,000 meters of depth would be as easy as "drinking a glass of water", when the individual has fastened his wrist to the max following a dip and a couple of strokes, then return instantly to lounge under the umbrella?
If this is their principal use, it's only the fault of old habits at least as far as the debut of the so-called divers of the modern age that dates back into the middle of the last century.
The incorrigible need to be the protagonist of the best diving watches
Three decades later, in 1953, Blancpain invented the Fifty Fathoms, among the most iconic timepieces the category can boast, was tied to Jacques-Yves Cousteau's wrist to battle the depths of the well-identified abysses in "The Silent World", a famed documentary -film also winner of the Oscar award.
Continuing, I feel that non-fans will remember well one of the very first Rolex Submariner look several times with Sean Connery, Agent 007 in the film Goldfinger shot of 1964. Tied to his wrist due to his fabric strap became a legend. It turned out to be a mythical reference 6538 no-guard, to know each other without the crown protector shoulders, imitated a bit by everyone.
These are just a couple of the very first cases that show - fiction or fact - for over fifty years, the press - driven by the watch industry - decided the diver watches ought to be the first to personify the idea of man-adventure. Maybe it is also from this day the brands when it came to describing their versions began to use the phrase: "appropriate for any occasion".
The 007 change, sadly also the legendary "Mr. Q "- the inventor of all the mechanisms of the most well-known secret agent in the world, and clearly also the opinion whose role has been played with the Omega Seamaster for many decades.
But beyond their real use in this massive family whose roots would only deal with "hard more than steel", now there are also models so bejeweled to fear even once you need to wash the hands.
But a true diver's watch has normally always had a lot to say technically speaking. Let us just mention the features and constructive philosophies of those references.
I have a long standing friend who is a professional diver and that, during his diving in the Persian Gulf, makes 100 percent of his diving watch - like that valve for the escape of gaseous mixtures which are breathed at large depths.
A real wrist sub Has to Be able to guarantee the following performances:
Fantastic visibility during the dip
A defense against magnetic fields superior to the standard
Resistance to salt and impact water
Accurate verification of the operation of the system that reports the dive time
An in-depth evaluation of the efficacy of its movement, either quartz or mechanical
But the tests didn't end here: now professional diving watches must adhere to certain rules such as those described by ISO 6425.
To get a common mortal use, that which we all know is the best, the best sub may be in the end a watchable to provide features much milder and easier to handle.
I remember this in order to simply immerse the surface in maximum security, a timepiece should be certified to withstand a pressure of 5 ATM (about 50 meters), which seems to be redundant, but this is not so when it's done a banal swim at the sea. It'd be better to avoid diving, particularly if ours could not even rely on a screw-on crown better still when protected on the sides from the classic two shoulders.
And the security on the watertight status of the submerged timepieces?
Precisely for people who would never use them for specialist purposes the ideal would be to have the ability to rely on a system that visually signals on the dial in the event the crown isn't completely screwed, and the watch is consequently in a clear state of non-security.
Sadly, this is the principal reason why an abyssal super dive watch may have to be hurried into a service center, before seawater entering risks compromising any mechanism indefinitely. This function already exists, however on hardly any versions, which frankly I don't understand why.
You may have worn out your diving diver's watch on your wrist to go to the sea and consequently, after adjusting the time, have left to twist the crown snugly. It is by here far the most frequent case.
Suggestion - As soon as you've worn the costume decide on the fly either leave your diver someplace safe, or obligatorily create a final but basic check on the tightening of the winding crown.
Now that we have seen a bit 'of issues related to the time that has to meet with the water, and given the essential advice, I reveal you more info which - to date - are for me the best dive watches.
They're not many: I have check here split them into two categories. The sequence in which they appear does not signify any ranking.